AccueilGalerieRechercherS'enregistrerConnexionNouveaux messages depuis dernière visite
Rechercher
 
 

Résultats par :
 
Rechercher Recherche avancée
Qui est en ligne ?
Il y a en tout 54 utilisateurs en ligne :: 28 Enregistrés, 0 Invisible et 26 Invités :: 2 Moteurs de recherche

121212, Apriliabarth, bailly jean pierre, charlie grouniache, demeilliers, Dialmax, EDOUARD Jean, fab43, falco15, FB21, fd-racing, FreezIce, Hadock, jeanmi, jhonguy, la denrée, ladepasse, Lolo15, luigino.g, MacPepR, mathdam, NADINE K, Niggi46, Philip, pépé gros pouces, side06, spyderman 32, Topino

Le record du nombre d'utilisateurs en ligne est de 294 le Lun 18 Nov - 20:11
Derniers sujets
» [Oldies] Restauration de mon side-car des années 1974/1975 (chassis court)
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 17:46 par dallara

» [Oldies] Partie Cycles de Vitesse Françaises de 60 à...
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 17:23 par fredomono

» [Oldies] Bourg-En-Bresse 1972
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 17:23 par tripotemascagne

» La FPE-JBB, une 250 deux temps française...
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 17:03 par Fügner

» [Oldies] Honda 500 RC 181
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 16:58 par Apriliabarth

» à voile et à vapeur..
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 16:24 par Dan42

» [Oldies] Malheureusement, ils sont partis...
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 15:15 par Pierre"PhilRead"

» [Oldies] Quizz??????
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 15:13 par philwood

» Norton Commando de piste et leurs différents cadres
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 15:07 par Gilles C

» [GP125] All that you wanted to know on Aprilia RSA 125, and more, by Mr Jan Thiel and Mr Frits Overmars (PART 5)
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 14:45 par josh20

» [Oldies] C'était le bon temps...
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 14:25 par Ed

» [Oldies] Montjuich
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 13:30 par philwood

» [oldies] Championnat d'Europe 1981-2008
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 13:08 par Philippe HENRION

» [Oldies] 50cc de vitesse : Toute leur histoire ! (partie 2)
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 13:05 par Derbitaco

» [Oldies] Lino Tonti
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 12:34 par Niggi46

» [ Oldies ] Jarno Saarinen, la star qui a revolutionné le pilotage (Part 5)
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 12:29 par JH42

» [Road racing] calendrier 2021
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 12:00 par mickey

» [Oldies] GP de France 1979 au Mans
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 11:49 par Niggi46

» [Oldies] Les Suzuki 500 RG ( Part 2 )
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 11:17 par Niggi46

» [GP] "Supermago, la machine à remonter le temps!"
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeAujourd'hui à 9:19 par Alain Gwada

» [MotoGP] GP 2019 / 20 , infos , nouveautés , résultats des tests , potins et ....
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 19:52 par Marc

»  [Road Racing] 2020
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 19:46 par Philippe Debarle

» [Oldies] Côte de Méru 1973
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 16:05 par jicel

» [ Oldies ] Trophée du Million, Magny-Cours 1979
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 15:46 par philwood

»  [Oldies] Les découvertes de Tonton Hubert (Part 4)
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 15:44 par Tonton Hub

» [SORTIES] Moto Légende 2020
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 11:32 par DidierF

» Trophées Jumeaux 2020
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeHier à 10:30 par charly7728

» [Oldies] Honda 6
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeJeu 26 Mar - 18:54 par biger

» [Oldies] Un petit bout de l’histoire Morbidelli, 1977-1979
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeJeu 26 Mar - 18:45 par dulas frederic

» [Endurance] 24 heures du Mans 2020
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeJeu 26 Mar - 17:40 par EDOUARD Jean

La réclame...
Mots-clés
wanted classic aermacchi honda ducati france RACING bresse suzuki 2013 charade 1980 bourg daytona rouge ROAD aprilia yamaha triumph zone geco 1976 eurosport side 1973 race
Meilleurs posteurs
Marc
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
philwood
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
EDOUARD Jean
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
Pierre"PhilRead"
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
mickey
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
Fügner
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
Jarno
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
yves kerlo
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
Dialmax
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
janpol84
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting16[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting13[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Voting15 
La réclame...
Le deal à ne pas rater :
Sélection d’ebooks gratuits en français proposée par La Fnac
Voir le deal

 

 [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?

Aller en bas 
Aller à la page : Précédent  1, 2, 3, 4  Suivant
AuteurMessage
GtG001



Nombre de messages : 81
Age : 65
Localisation : Adelaide, Australia
Date d'inscription : 03/06/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Hydro Forming   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeSam 14 Juil - 12:53

Hi Howard and others,
Thanks for the photos and tips on hydro forming.
I have hydro formed a few pipes but I could not get them consistently accurate. As you say, the amount of stretch needs to be controlled.
I noticed that you start with a rolled edge at 90 degrees before welding. That was the next thing I was going to try to allow the edges to fully form without tearing the welds. Originally, after welding the tears, I noticed that it formed better. From that experience, I now anneal the weld along the way to allow it to fully form without as much tearing but I am always looking for a better method.
Do you roll that edge or beat it over a dolly?
I use a pressure washer capable of 1800 psi and a manually regulator with a gauge from a hydraulic supplier. The regulator is at the outlet of the pipe and allows the water to flow through the pipe and the air to be bleed out before I close the regulator down. This allows the pressure to slowly increase for better control.

Can I ask what metal you use?
I use 1mm cold drawn steel sheet – not sure what the temper was but I look it up and post later.

Great topic, keep it going please.

Regards
Allan.


Dernière édition par GtG001 le Dim 15 Juil - 4:13, édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Howard Gifford



Nombre de messages : 139
Age : 63
Localisation : Ottawa Canada
Date d'inscription : 01/05/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeDim 15 Juil - 2:19

I use 19 gage (.041") cold rolled steel ,nothing special.
I use a home made hand driven roller to roll the edge. I also use a small press that has an adjustable relief valve to allow the pipe to expand automatically in the press. The prssure setting depends on the size of the pipe . I press the pipe between two plates of steel covered with plywood. The press allows the entire pipe to expand evenly. Without it the center expands first and creates some horrible ripples. Everythin g is done cold. I do not recommend heating the pipe at all with any pressure in it.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
GtG001



Nombre de messages : 81
Age : 65
Localisation : Adelaide, Australia
Date d'inscription : 03/06/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeDim 15 Juil - 4:10

Hi Howard,
Thanks for the tip on the press – makes sense to restrict those areas when you hear it – a bit like squeezing one of those long thin balloons to get it to shape. In addition, the use of tube to restrict the belly is another good idea.
I had thought of making a Fiberglass mould for that purpose but it seemed too much work for the limited use it would get.
I think for my application, I will use both the hydro forming for the hard to make parts of the pipes and use rolled cones for the straight parts – at least until I can get the accuracy with hydro forming.

BTW - I never heat the pipe when it is pressurized, only after welding to anneal the metal.
Would you post a photo of the rollers you use as I would like to make one if that is all right with you.

For those of you looking for a cheap muffler, try here: [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
They make Carbon ones as well.

Regards
Allan.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
edu maccario



Nombre de messages : 1
Localisation : argentina
Date d'inscription : 17/08/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: escape artesanal   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeVen 17 Aoû - 7:28

bonjour je suis de l'Argentine que j'ai 19 ans et j'aime les 2 à plusieurs reprises et je tiens à partager la photo d'une fuite qui fait ami sn.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
dcracing1



Nombre de messages : 2
Localisation : Vancouver, Canada
Date d'inscription : 10/09/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMer 12 Sep - 4:59

Late to the party as usual. I hydroformed the headers and rolled the cones for the last pipes I built. They're ugly as can be but perform well. Howard, the pipes you're hydroforming are absolutely beautiful.
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir cette image]
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
dutch fisher



Nombre de messages : 19
Localisation : England
Date d'inscription : 07/09/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 11:12

Frits Overmars a écrit:
I started writing my own physics programs around 1970, so over the decades it became quite a collection. They are not available to the public. Because I wrote them for personal use only, they are rather user-unfriendly and distributing them would cause an avalanche of questions that would completely rob what little time I have left; I would not be able to visit this forum any more Wink.

Frits, would you be willing to share the formula you use in your program to calculate the variation in crankshaft velocity in a single cycle

Regards
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Frits Overmars

Frits Overmars

Nombre de messages : 2300
Age : 71
Localisation : Raalte, Holland
Date d'inscription : 12/10/2010

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 16:21

dutch fisher a écrit:
Frits Overmars a écrit:
I started writing my own physics programs around 1970, so over the decades it became quite a collection. They are not available to the public. Because I wrote them for personal use only, they are rather user-unfriendly and distributing them would cause an avalanche of questions that would completely rob what little time I have left; I would not be able to visit this forum any more Wink.
Frits, would you be willing to share the formula you use in your program to calculate the variation in crankshaft velocity in a single cycle.
Willing yes, able no. It is not a formula, it's a program. And for the answer to your next question: see above.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Howard Gifford



Nombre de messages : 139
Age : 63
Localisation : Ottawa Canada
Date d'inscription : 01/05/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 17:29

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 809262 Frits does the variation in rotational velocity amount to enough to upset the operation of the pipe or is it small enough to not worry about? having a twin cylinder made from similar cylinders usually use identical pipes to the single cylinder and a twin must have a lot less variation in crank speed.
We have a twin cylinder engine that is converted to run as a single in order to cut our development costs inb half. Usually the output of the twin is higher than two times the output of the single.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Frits Overmars

Frits Overmars

Nombre de messages : 2300
Age : 71
Localisation : Raalte, Holland
Date d'inscription : 12/10/2010

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 19:00

Howard Gifford a écrit:
Frits does the variation in rotational velocity amount to enough to upset the operation of the pipe or is it small enough to not worry about?
That variation is rather small to begin with. Furthermore it is a variation within a crankshaft revolution so the duration of a whole revolution is not noticeably affected.
Citation :
having a twin cylinder made from similar cylinders usually use identical pipes to the single cylinder and a twin must have a lot less variation in crank speed.
That depends; if you compare a single with a 180° parallel twin, the irregularity is almost identical; you can find some comparative graphs in the Big Bang topic if I'm not mistaken.
If you are talking about a 90° firing interval, then the difference is noticeable, but I never bothered to let it influence desired pipe behaviour.
Citation :
We have a twin cylinder engine that is converted to run as a single in order to cut our development costs inb half. Usually the output of the twin is higher than two times the output of the single.
I'm guessing here: I've seen that happen when both cylinders breathe through a common airbox. when each of them awaits its turn, they bot get more air.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
GrahamB

GrahamB

Nombre de messages : 3457
Age : 58
Localisation : Lyon
Date d'inscription : 19/08/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 21:32

Frits Overmars a écrit:
Citation :
Usually the output of the twin is higher than two times the output of the single.
I'm guessing here: I've seen that happen when both cylinders breathe through a common airbox. when each of them awaits its turn, they bot get more air.

Frits, wouldn't that work the other way around? Ie the shared airbox would give less than double power, since the front cylinder in a V starts drawing before the rear has finished? It's interesting that Suzuki's RGV street-bike used a split airbox but Honda never bothered on the RS. And I've never had a chance to see an RSW250 airbox...

This might be a topic of interest for Francis, given the phasing of his motor...
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Frits Overmars

Frits Overmars

Nombre de messages : 2300
Age : 71
Localisation : Raalte, Holland
Date d'inscription : 12/10/2010

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 22:00

GrahamB a écrit:
Frits Overmars a écrit:
Citation :
Usually the output of the twin is higher than two times the output of the single.
I'm guessing here: I've seen that happen when both cylinders breathe through a common airbox. when each of them awaits its turn, they bot get more air.
Frits, wouldn't that work the other way around? Ie the shared airbox would give less than double power, since the front cylinder in a V starts drawing before the rear has finished? It's interesting that Suzuki's RGV street-bike used a split airbox but Honda never bothered on the RS. And I've never had a chance to see an RSW250 airbox...
This might be a topic of interest for Francis, given the phasing of his motor...
For the functioning of the airbox a 180° twin would be best. Because the inlet phases are usually longer than 180°, the breathing of both cylinders would still get a bit in each other's way, so two separate airboxes would be better still, if you can find a place for them, but most of the time only one cylinder would draw from the large volume of a common airbox.
In a 90° twin (V or parallel won't matter in this respect) they are a bit more in each other's way. But in a twingle both cylinders would constantly be fighting each other for air. That may be one of the reasons that Francis has abandoned his airbox for now.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
fpayart

fpayart

Nombre de messages : 1061
Age : 70
Localisation : LYON
Date d'inscription : 11/01/2010

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 22:19

Just ask! [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 809262

This is the last model :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]

This is a little older model :
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
http://www.fperacing.com/
fpayart

fpayart

Nombre de messages : 1061
Age : 70
Localisation : LYON
Date d'inscription : 11/01/2010

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 22:40

@ GrahamB,

Sorry Graham to the poverty of "my" English, I am not able to correctly translate your sentence: "This might be a topic of interest for Francis, Given the phasing of his motor ..."
If I use a translator, here's what I get: "Cela pourrait être un sujet d'intérêt pour Francis, Compte tenu de l'échelonnement de son moteur" [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 55116

The two cylinders of our motor operate simultaneously, this means that the suction volume is a cubic capacity of 250 cc every 360 °
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
http://www.fperacing.com/
GrahamB

GrahamB

Nombre de messages : 3457
Age : 58
Localisation : Lyon
Date d'inscription : 19/08/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 23:32

Yes, I was trying to be obscure in case you didn't want to tell everyone [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 998726

So I was thinking what Frits said: your two carbs are both sucking at the same time, so they are fighting each other for air in a small airbox...
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
GrahamB

GrahamB

Nombre de messages : 3457
Age : 58
Localisation : Lyon
Date d'inscription : 19/08/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 23:35

fpayart a écrit:
Just ask! [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 809262

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 771973

Et à l'intérieure, il n'y a pas de division entre les deux sorties d'air, les deux carbus tirent directement du même espace ?
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
fpayart

fpayart

Nombre de messages : 1061
Age : 70
Localisation : LYON
Date d'inscription : 11/01/2010

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMar 25 Sep - 23:43

Oui, voici la pièce qui se monte sur les carbus vue de l'intérieur
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
http://www.fperacing.com/
Haufen



Nombre de messages : 55
Localisation : Allemagne
Date d'inscription : 23/12/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeSam 29 Sep - 20:06

Thanks for the pictures! Is there really a filter element that close to the carb bellmouth? Doesn't it get soaked from blowback fuel pretty quick?
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
GrahamB

GrahamB

Nombre de messages : 3457
Age : 58
Localisation : Lyon
Date d'inscription : 19/08/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeSam 29 Sep - 22:20

It looks like there is some very coarse foam there, but it would only be good for stopping rocks. Blowback would just save you from needing to oil the foam [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 771973
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
libbresse



Nombre de messages : 4
Localisation : Sweden
Date d'inscription : 02/04/2013

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeJeu 18 Avr - 22:48

Great looking pipes Howard [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 241515 Which cadprogram do you use when you make the templates ?

/Anders
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Howard Gifford



Nombre de messages : 139
Age : 63
Localisation : Ottawa Canada
Date d'inscription : 01/05/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeVen 19 Avr - 1:21

The templates are made "old school" on a drafting board. I make a centerline using an aluminum yardstick bent roughly the shape of the bend of the pipe and mark it off in 1 inch segments. I transfer the measurements from a full scale straightline drawing. I connect the dots with a flexible curve. I number each segment on both the template and the drawing and transfere the construction lines to the metal for future reference
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
alwoodman1



Nombre de messages : 8
Localisation : Argentina
Date d'inscription : 24/04/2012

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeLun 9 Mai - 14:59

Muchas gracias a todos. Mi pregunta: ¿ cuál es la forma para evitar que la entrada al sistema no se cierre o se curve tanto?, Como no puedo subir fotos solo me registra el enlace, si alguno me hace el favor para ue se oueda ver el trabajo que hacemos.

Thank you very much to all. My question: what is the way to prevent the entry into the system is not closed or curve so ?, As I can not upload photos only records me the link, if any you please so you can see the work we do .
[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] Yamaha RD 125cc

[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien] Zanella 125 (Minarelli)
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Riley Will



Nombre de messages : 54
Age : 47
Localisation : Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date d'inscription : 14/01/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeLun 2 Jan - 6:44

Howard made a believer out of me on the 2 times he built pipes for BRC. First he copied our Type 21 pipe then he made pipes for our V2 prototype engine. He delivered exactly what we asked for. They are things of beauty too!
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
http://www.brceng.com
Niels Abildgaard



Nombre de messages : 35
Localisation : Denmark
Date d'inscription : 26/02/2013

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeLun 2 Jan - 12:40

Riley Will a écrit:
our V2 prototype engine.
Can we have some news or pictures?
I am in love with 90 degree V2s with common crancase and common exhaust system.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Riley Will



Nombre de messages : 54
Age : 47
Localisation : Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date d'inscription : 14/01/2011

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeMer 1 Fév - 2:38

How do I post photos? Send me your email address and maybe you can post to me. [Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir ce lien]
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
http://www.brceng.com
Niels Abildgaard



Nombre de messages : 35
Localisation : Denmark
Date d'inscription : 26/02/2013

[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitimeJeu 2 Fév - 11:06

Riley Will a écrit:
How do I post photos?  Send me your email address and maybe you can post to me.  rwill@brceng.com
Hello Riley and thank You for remembering my question.Mailadress has been sent to Your mail.

[Vous devez être inscrit et connecté pour voir cette image]
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Contenu sponsorisé




[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Empty
MessageSujet: Re: [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?   [GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones? - Page 3 Icon_minitime

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
 
[GP 125 & 250] Why hydroforming is not as good as welded cones?
Revenir en haut 
Page 3 sur 4Aller à la page : Précédent  1, 2, 3, 4  Suivant
 Sujets similaires
-
» Kaiser et le saut : difficile à le suivre
» SORRY GOOD GAME !!
» Pourquoi vous n'achèterez plus de pneus Goodyear
» HAPPY GOOD YEAR
» Effet Brinell

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
 :: ACTUALITES :: [GP] :: [GP125 (et 250 Snif!)]-
Sauter vers: